Abusing Science is a manual for intellectual self-defense, the most complete As Kitcher argues in this rigorous but highly readable book, the integrity of. PDF | On Nov 1, , Gary Jason and others published Review of: P. Kitcher, Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism. “Abusing Science” is a manual for intellectual self-defense, the most complete available for presenting the case against Creationist pseudo-science. It is also a .
|Published (Last):||16 January 2017|
|PDF File Size:||3.10 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.79 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Science Logic and Mathematics. Michael A Gabalski rated it really liked it Dec 24, The book begins with a concise introduction to evolutionary theory for non-scientists and closes with a rebuttal of jitcher charge that this theory undermines religious and moral values. Contemporary Creationists may have lost one legal battle, but their cause continues to thrive.
Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism by Philip Kitcher
The Case Against Creationism. Last, but not least, Kitcher demonstrates the religious origins of “Scientific Creationism”. Philip Kitcher, “Abusing Science: Kkitcher article has no associated abstract. Innosanto rated it it was amazing Jan 07, Mattdrussell rated it really liked it Oct 11, Panu Raatikainen – – Tiede and Edistys 1. Read, highlight, and take notes, across web, tablet, and phone.
Apparently amidst abbusing his philosophy of science texts he also wrote a book on Finne A lot of well-reasoned arguments. Remembered about it tonight because Bill Nye was debating some creationist moron.
It is also a lucid exposition of the nature and methods of genuine science. Kitcher is able to slice through creationist objections by showing how they very frequ This is by far the best book I have read defending the theory of evolution against creationist challenges. Then again I’m a filthy heathen! History of Western Philosophy. Sign in Create an account. Brian Baigrie University of Toronto. In spite of being over 35 years old at this point, the book holds up very well, not least because Creationist arguments never die, they just smell worse and worse with age.
Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics: Kitcher lays out in the final chapter a view of the potential compatibility of non-fundamentalist Christianity and the established science, but again I think he’s a bit too charitable.
Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism
Kitcher successfully notes why those who argue equal time for “Evolution Science” and “Creation Science” in high school science education are misguided, devious, or both.
There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
A damn good and interesting read. The Evidence Against the New Creationism. A Journal of the History of Science Kitcher, at every turn, does his best to assign nothing but good faith to the abuslng camp; even while completing the quotes they have taken out of context, and while filling in the blanks for all of the vital qualifying statements made by the misquoted scientists abused by their creationist fellows.
Abusinv and the Common Good: This is indeed an important primer on how to think abusinf, answering at length all criticisms of contermporary science by so-called “scientific” creationists. Roland – – Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 2: Bence Nanay – – Theoria It makes no useful predictions about observed, or unobserved phenomena. Abusing Science is a manual for intellectual self-defense, the most complete available for presenting the case against Creationist pseudo-science. History of Western Philosophy.
Moreover, modern biology is intertwined with other fields of science–physics, chemistry, astronomy, and geology. This is by far the best book I have read defending the theory of evolution against creationist challenges.
I recommend this book. Brown – – Contemporary Pragmatism 7 2: Published June 23rd by Mit Press first published Aurora Bravo rated it really liked it Oct 25, Dcience book begins with a concise introduction to evolutionary theory for non-scientists This article has no associated abstract.
No keywords specified fix it. It will astonish many readers that this case must still be made in the litcher, but since it must, Philip Kitcher makes it irresistibly and forcefully.