The Reception of the Sokal Affair in France—”Pomo” Hunting or Intellectual Mccarthyism?: A Propos of Impostures Intellectuelles by A. Sokal and J. Bricmont. Imposturas Intelectuais (Alan Sokal & Jean Bricmont). 2 likes. Book. Papers by Alan Sokal on the “Social Text Affair”; Sokal-Bricmont book . São Paulo, Jornal de Resenhas, 11 abril ); “Descomposturas intelectuais”, ” Imposturas e fantasias”, by Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont (Folha de.
|Published (Last):||10 March 2010|
|PDF File Size:||9.93 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.39 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Imposturas Intelectuais, de Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont – DisputatioDisputatio
Retrieved from ” https: Fink says that “Lacan could easily assume that his faithful seminar public This page was last edited on 27 Decemberat From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The extracts are intentionally rather long to avoid accusations of taking sentences out of context.
He calls it ridiculous and weird that there are intensities of treatment by the scientists, in particular, that he was “much less badly treated,” when in fact he was the main target of the US press.
The stated goal of the book is not to attack “philosophy, the humanities or the social sciences in general The book has been criticized by post-modern philosophers and by scholars with some interest in continental philosophy. Two Millennia of Mathematics: Several scientists have expressed similar sentiments.
Lacan to the Letter. According to some reports, the response within the humanities was “polarized.
Number Theory for Computing 2nd ed. Richard Dawkinsin a review of this book, said regarding the discussion of Lacan: They argue that this view is held by a number of people, including people who the authors label “postmodernists” and the Strong Programme in the sociology of science, and that it is illogical, impractical, and dangerous.
Cover of the first edition. Retrieved 15 April Some are delighted, some are enraged. Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science Cover of the first edition.
Sokal and Bricmont highlight the rising tide of what they call cognitive relativismthe belief that there are no objective truths but only local beliefs. Postmodernism Philosophy of science. But a philosopher who is caught equating the erectile organ to the square root of minus one has, for my money, blown his credentials when it comes to things that I don’t know anything about. University of Minnesota Press. Sokal and Bricmont claim that they do not intend to analyze postmodernist thought in general.
Probably no one concerned with postmodernism has remained unaware of it. Noam Chomsky called the book “very important” and said that “a lot of the so-called ‘left’ criticism [of science] seems to be pure nonsense”. At Whom Are We Laughing?
Rather, they aim to draw attention to the abuse of concepts from mathematics and physics, subjects they’ve devoted their careers to studying alah teaching.
Sokal and Bricmont define abuse of mathematics and physics as:.
People have been bitterly divided. University of Michigan Press. The book gives a chapter to each of the above-mentioned authors, “the tip of the iceberg” of a group of intellectual practices that can be described as “mystification, deliberately obscure language, confused thinking and the misuse of scientific concepts.
Alan Sokal Articles on the “Social Text” Affair
According to New York Review of Books editor Barbara Epsteinwho was delighted by Sokal’s hoaxwithin the humanities the response to the book was bitterly divided, with some delighted and some enraged;  in some reading groupsreaction was polarized between impassioned supporters and inte,ectuais impassioned opponents of Sokal. Retrieved March 5, Perhaps he is genuine when he speaks of non-scientific subjects? Contemporary Cultural Theory 3rd ed.
In Jacques Derrida ‘s response, “Sokal and Bricmont Aren’t Serious,” first published in Le MondeDerrida writes that the Sokal hoax is rather “sad,” not only because Alan Sokal’s name is now linked primarily to a hoaxnot to sciencebut also because the chance to impksturas seriously on this issue has been ruined for a broad public forum that deserves better.
Retrieved 25 June He then writes of his hope that in the future this work is pursued more seriously and with dignity at the level of the issues involved. The philosopher Thomas Nagel has supported Sokal and Bricmont, describing their book as consisting largely of “extensive quotations of scientific gibberish from name-brand French intellectuals, together with eerily patient explanations of why it is gibberish,”  and agreeing that “there does seem to be something about the Parisian scene that is particularly hospitable to reckless verbosity.
Sokal is best known for the Sokal Affairin which he submitted a deliberately absurd article  to Social Texta critical theory journal, and was able to get it published. Views Read Edit View history. Event occurs at 3: They also suggest that, in criticising Irigaray, Sokal and Bricmont sometimes go intelectuaiz their area of expertise in the sciences and simply express a differing position on gender politics.
Imposturas Intelectuais, de Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont
From Archimedes to Gauss. Ijtelectuais her considerations to physics, science hystorian Mara Beller  maintained that it was not entirely fair to blame contemporary postmodern philosophers for drawing nonsensical conclusions from quantum physics which they did dosince many such conclusions were drawn by some of the somal quantum physicists themselves, such as Bohr or Heisenberg when they ventured into philosophy. Their aim is “not to criticize the left, but to help defend it from a trendy segment of itself.