DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for. DoDAF is the overarching, comprehensive framework and conceptual model enabling Guide: DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for the United States Department of Defense that provides structure.
|Published (Last):||15 August 2008|
|PDF File Size:||14.31 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.23 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Employing MagicDraw in DoDAF promotes significant improvement in processes, program and people efficiencies as well as shorter cycle times.
The Department of Defense Architecture Framework DoDAF is an architecture framework for the United States Department of Defense DoD that provides visualization infrastructure for specific stakeholders concerns through viewpoints organized by various views.
Commons category link is on Wikidata. These dovaf are organized under four views:. A capability thread would equate to the specific activities, rules, and systems that are linked to that particular capability. In addition, a note on system engineering is included. The presentational aspects should not overemphasize the pictorial presentation at the expense of ddaf underlying data.
Department of Defense Architecture Framework
Overview Product Offerings Professional Services. Otherwise there is the risk of producing products with no customers. Each view depicts certain perspectives of an architecture as described below. The Operational Viewpoint now can describe rules and constraints for any function business, intelligence, 2.0, etc.
While it is clearly dodxf at military systems, DoDAF has broad applicability across the private, public and voluntary sectors around the world, and represents one of a large number of systems architecture frameworks.
This Architecture Framework is especially suited to large systems with complex integration and interoperability challenges, and it is apparently unique in its employment of “operational views”.
Systems and services view SV is a set of graphical and textual products that describe systems and services and interconnections providing for, or supporting, DoD functions. The developing system must not only meet its internal data needs but also those of the operational framework into which it is set. In simpler terms, integration is seen in the connection from items common among architecture doddaf, where items shown in one architecture product such as sites used or systems interfaced or services provided should have the identical number, name, and meaning appear in related architecture product views.
DoDAF also serves as the principal guide for development of integrated architectures as defined in DoD Instruction The Views described in DoDAF, including those that are legacy Views from previous versions of the Framework, are provided as pre-defined examples that can be used when developing presentations of architectural data.
Many times, these design products were not understandable or useful to their intended audience. In other projects Wikimedia Commons. PfM uses the Architectural Description to analyze decisions on fielding or analysis of a needed capability. Operational View OV products provide descriptions of the tasks and activities, operational elements, and information exchanges required to accomplish DoD missions.
The relationship between architecture data elements across the SV to the OV can be exemplified as systems are procured and fielded to support organizations and their operations. For more information or a quote please contact sales nomagic. It defines the type of information exchanged, the frequency of exchanges, the tasks and activities supported by these exchanges and the nature of the exchanges. The repository is defined by the common database schema Core Architecture Data Model 2.
While it is clearly aimed at military systems, DoDAF has broad applicability across the private, public dodac voluntary sectors around the world, and represents one of a large number of systems architecture frameworks.
Department of Defense Architecture Framework – Wikipedia
Technical standards view TV products define technical standards, implementation conventions, business rules and criteria that govern the architecture. It broadened the applicability of architecture tenets and practices to all Mission Areas rather than just the C4ISR community.
Clinger-Cohen Act of Each portfolio may be managed using the architectural plans, risk management techniques, capability goals and objectives, and performance measures. Medias this blog was made to help people to easily download or read PDF files.
Doraf provides guidance and suggestions on how to ensure that other proposed methods can be adapted as needed to meet the DoD requirements for dodxf collection and storage.
Efficiency – Benefit from dodag speed to deploy, optimized resource allocation, improved collaboration and reduced overall cycle times.
DoDAF Conformance ensures reuse of information and that architecture artifacts, models, and viewpoints can be shared with common understanding. In addition to graphical representation, there is typically a requirement to provide metadata to the Defense Information Technology Portfolio Repository DITPR or other architectural repositories.
SE processes are applied to allow an orderly progression from one level of development to the next detailed level using controlled baselines. And what’s more, No Magic fully supports all architectural framework products ensuring you achieve mission results. Program Accountability – Provide Program Manager accountability including the enablement of net-centric processes and architectures, flexibility and responsiveness.
Views Read Edit View history. Product Descriptions” and a “Deskbook”. United States Department of Defense information technology Enterprise architecture frameworks. Definitions and Guidelines”, “II: The architect and stakeholders select views to ensure that the Architectural Descriptions will support current and future states of the process or activity under review.
The DoDAF deskbook provides examples in using traditional systems engineering and data engineering techniques, and secondly, UML format.
DoDAF generically dodwf in the representation of the artifacts to be generated, but allows considerable flexibility regarding the specific formats and modeling techniques. There are many different approaches for creating an integrated architecture using DoDAF and for determining which products are required. For the purposes of architecture development, the term integrated means that data required in more than one of the architectural models is commonly defined and understood across those models.
This page was last edited on 3 Octoberat It establishes a basis for semantic i.